So there's a sports retailer in the UK called Sports Direct and they've been using facial recognition in order to reduce crime. However, lots of MPs have pushed back against this and said that this is a bit too far and somewhat an evasion of privacy and just overstepping the mark is the company wrong because it's reducing theft or are they doing something that's overstepping the mark? What are your thoughts personally for me? I think they're going a bit too far and that kind of coincides with the owner Mike Ashley always putting prophets first.

I think of regulated facial recognition for this type of purpose is it's a slippery slope I don't wanna argue for it although I get why they might increment that if you know some businesses like supermarkets and retailers actually bake in theft as part of their forecasting financial projections I am so I get where they put their money into because they're losing tens are in the Earth earth than Natalie this is what they wanna do

Honestly I think of the states is something going on the same thing I can't prove it is only conspiracy right now like a berry but it's one of the things I say this is where we going is it gonna hurt way more people I was gonna make butter does not make the margarine between certain classes because you guys will be doing I was not so much races muscle class so much did I get a big and is going to target certain groups I have a lot of people gonna go