So with that in mind, you could pretty much see how almost any opinion could be a pre-described notion by whatever corporations seem to be backing it up. It's really just pandering to whatever audiences to try and induce certain actions and behaviors of people.

So if you have an original thought or critique about a certain opinion And that's going against a certain narrative and a lot of people who seem to agree with it But the only reason they agree with it is because they picked it up off of somebody that they're influenced by

So after observing how everybody just seems to be on this algorithm thought process, I could see how one person who goes against that grain, who holds firm in their beliefs and with no fallacies to the way in which they're coming to their conclusions, why they would be dangerous not to society but rather to the world.

It would be dangerous because they are the immovable stone that is not only able to remain true in who they are, but also be able to ignite and spark that in the minds of other people. That would be dangerous to all these entities that are ab-