Right, right, right. What would you rather do? Travel Europe for free for a whole year or get cast in a movie wherever you want for three months. Right now.

Nope, it's gotta be Europe for a year. Because if you're gonna be cast into a movie, there's still a risk that movie won't do well. But then if you travel in Europe for a year, you can go anywhere you want with no problem.

Oh I would way rather travel Europe for free for a year Europe is so beautiful and I don't think I would like acting

I'm gonna go with the movie not saying that Whatever it's gonna take off or whatever like that But it's an opportunity to is whatever I want and I probably get paid and I end up traveling the U.S. drink In it anyway, I'm gonna go with the movie not saying that

I would totally go with being a movie because then you can continually collect royalties from it later on.

Oh, I would rather get cast in a movie for sure.

I think I'd rather travel Europe for a whole year, all expenses paid, because if I'm acting, I want somebody's schedule. I mean they're compensating me for the trip for three months, but still I don't really see the enjoyment in that.

I would rather travel Europe for free for a year. I think that would be amazing. And I probably wouldn't want to leave.

Um, I was born to be a superstar so get cast in a movie 1000% Find me up. Yes, that's what I want to do.

Definitely would choose Europe for a year.

I'd rather travel to Europe for free for an entire year.