Cookies

By clicking “Fine”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts.
Audio
Text
Keygan 451d
Keygan
3
Reply
Copy link to post
Colin 451d
Colin
2
Reply
Copy link to post
Kathleen Slater
1
Reply
Copy link to post
Kathleen Slater
1
Reply
Copy link to post
Deleted user 451d
Deleted user
1
Copy link to post
 
Deleted user
Add comment
OK so if you have three baby daddies should one of the baby daddies bring food for all your children or just his child as I recently saw this on Instagram with the lady had a bunch of children and then a guy brought food for just one child and then she got mad and she threw the food in the end and a drink so you have three baby daddies one comes to bring food for his child should he have bought food for all of the children or if you're a guy would you bring food for just your child or all the children and women the same champion
2
6
Copy link to post
If she wanted one man to provide for all her kids she should've had kids with one man
3
Reply
Copy link to post
Fuck the other kids, just his kid. And why you got three baby daddies? Keep your fucking priorities straight.
2
Reply
Copy link to post
What I was trying to say, it is not required because he didn't have those other children. I will make each father take care of his own child because it's only fair.
1
Reply
Copy link to post
It's his responsibility to provide for his child. It's not his responsibility to provide for the other children. How the mother handles it, it's not his problem. He's buying food for his child, he's done his part. That's it.
1
Copy link to post
And she should split the food on make-up plan B because now he's done his part. She split that child's food for the other children. That's a workable solution.
Reply
Copy link to post
Add comment
Follow Us
English
© Stereo, 2024
Get the full experience on the Stereo app
Open app