Rather than a question, this is more of a thought. If- what's up with evolution? Because if we started from monkeys and evolved to humans, why the fuck is there still monkeys? That makes no sense to me.
Dogs are wolves that have been domesticated over time. One is a predator and one lives in a household. Over time, the wolves that were forced into the household began to physically change because they had to adapt.
Dogs and wolves are not two completely different animals. They're actually the same animal. It's just one had been domesticated and had physical changes over time and the other one still lives in the wilderness.
100% we evolved on this planet. If you look back in history we've been wiped out from this planet and we'll keep evolving back here. We are this planet's immune system. The sun's the male, the planet's the female.
Well, you literally just said faith means you have no evidence, so if you have no evidence, it's not like a counterpoint to evolution. It just means you want to deny evolution because you want to pretend like there's a god. It's just...
I mean, using your logic, doesn't that mean that Christianity, Islam, Judaism, and most religions are also lies? Technically, because I mean, you can't see, touch or go back and experience those things either. We can just read a book.
Ironically or unironically, the only thing that you can prove is science. It's reproducible. Anybody who gets knowledge on the methodologies can reproduce the exact same results. That's kind of the fucking point.
Actually, evolution is also by faith. Because we've never been able to witness evolution. Only mutations, which is what you guys are talking about when you're talking about different animals and different...
So you're comparing a set of beliefs and traditions that people believe in versus biology and genetic makeup. That is a false equivalency fallacy. Those two things should not be compared. They change completely different.
I agree that myths and making up stuff out of thin air because you're dishonest and you like special pleading and making fallacies is not in the same realm as evidence. It's the rest of it that we know.
I'll let it slide because you're just ignorant. Just do research and you'll see that false equivalency fallacy is an actual fallacy that you're using. It is the unfair comparison between two things and saying it's the same thing when it's completely not.
You know what's crazy about evolutionists? They can claim all day that we evolved from monkeys, but where they stumble is exactly how. What environmental changes required us to change so much that we became so separate?
What's crazy is most historians credit Dawin for establishing the theory evolution when it existed before Darwin we are poo from Leonardo da Vinci who did it work and he depicted evolution so that the belief of evolution existed before
Second of all, you're committing multiple logical fallacies, but I think the most grotesque one is that you're saying that your point of reference is the only point of reference, and unless I have that point of reference, I can't understand what you're saying, which is so fallacious.