I pose a question to these people who talk in philosophical, logical arguments, those that believe in God and those that do not. I'm supposed to be able to categorize something and if it can't be categorized, then it's absurdly not true. And when you ask how the fuck you got to that, they tell you that you're an idiot and that you don't understand. And you know what? Maybe I am. But I know this. I know that when I measure something, I get a fucking result and it's exactly as the equation predicted. And it happens every time, every fucking time. That's true. And you suck.

Joey the discussion was how to argue that God is real so the whole thing started then they brought up the subject predicate argument and used linguistics to to explain an example that they made up involving the color blue which is

And there was a disagreement about whether or not we could measure the wavelength. They questioned, how are you going to measure it? How are you going to ensure that your instrument is accurate? How are you going to ensure the calibration of the instrument is accurate? Okay, they questioned all that shit. You tell me there was never a disagreement on if you can measure it. Yes, there was. What are you talking about, man?

And just to be clear, as you know, but as far as everyone else knows, I did not come up with the example of using the example, how are we going to prove the sky is blue? They did. They chose an example that would fit their little logic test, and it would show them to be right in however format that they use, and it worked, and it's fine. They can use that to define what's true, and I will use science.

Look, if you believe, you believe. It's all good, man. Everybody has the right to believe whatever they want. They don't have to explain it to anybody. If they want to advocate and try to spread the word, okay, that's one thing, right? You don't need it. You don't need an excuse. So, believe, man. Good. They believe in something. Good. It's good to believe in something.

Yes, okay, I'm I'm listening to the thing again, right? He says I can make a statement that says God is real because the sky is blue. I Didn't have anything to do with that statement. That's completely him All right, go back and listen to it man, that's what I'm doing right now

God is necessary to prove that the sky is blue because the contrary is absurd. To say that the sky is blue without the existence of God is absurd. That's their argument. It's absurd that the sky would be blue without God. That is crazy.

either God substantiates all categories or God does not substantiate all categories and because because if you say blue is between wavelength A and B but it just shifts one over then could it still be perceived as blue and if you can't categorize then God exists