Cookies
Durch das Klicken auf „Fein“ klicken, stimmst der Speicherung von Cookies auf deinem Gerät zu, um die Navigation auf der Website zu verbessern, die Nutzung der Website zu analysieren und unsere Marketingbemühungen zu unterstützen.
Fein
Mehr erfahren
Audio
Text
Kommentieren
I know... I know that umm, some people are gonna give you pushback for this But this is not information that should be argued over These are facts that should be pondered over
1
Antworten
Link zu Post kopieren
The original verses, the original Bible verses... When they started translating them was misinterpreted, ...incredibly wrong. There are many umm, versions of the Bible and none of them are the same.
1
Antworten
Link zu Post kopieren
umm, there's no evidence for you to say Jesus Christ was never crucified so, there's no historical evidence. You just making a claim umm, you say that Jesus Christ is the messiah and there are many prophecies one being, like him being born as a virgin and many others, all fulfilled in Jesus
1
Link zu Post kopieren
Dynex, for you to say there's no evidence when clearly Jerome was mentioned there, that's no different than Christians talking about something Josephus said as evidence, you know? Are you just saying stuff to be saying it or are you actually listening and thinking about what's being said? Or is it just defend what you believe at all cost, even if it don't make sense?
2
Antworten
Link zu Post kopieren
Demonstrably false. Saint Jerome in his work against the Luciferians, his letter, which he is quoting by the way, this, um, shake or whatever. Uh, he's addressing the heresy of Docetism, the belief that Jesus Christ was fully God, but was not human. And he was an act spiritual avatar that was made manifest here on earth has nothing to do with the crucifixion. This guy's is lying through his teeth.
Antworten
Link zu Post kopieren
If you think I am wrong, just do some study on his anthropology, St. Jerome's writing against the Luciferians, and you will see that he is clearly talking about docetism. It is not in the reference to the event of the crucifixion, but whether or not Jesus had a physical body at all.
Antworten
Link zu Post kopieren
This major disagreement in Christianity is not the Trinity, he's right about that, but he's also wrong about whatever nonsense he's talking about. The first major disagreement was the Council of Jerusalem, which was a local Synod between St. Peter and St. Paul, and St. Andrew was presiding over the Synod. The disagreement was on about whether or not a Gentile should undergo circumcision and partake of the Jewish customs, which the Synod ultimately decided on, no, that's
Antworten
Link zu Post kopieren
Kommentieren
Lass dir das nicht entgehen!
Leute auf Stereo sind die ersten, die darüber sprechen
Los geht’s