Файлы cookie

Нажимая "Хорошо", вы соглашаетесь на сохранение файлов cookie на вашем устройстве для улучшения навигации по сайту, анализа использования сайта и помощи в наших маркетинговых усилиях.
Аудио
Текст
Christian James
1
10
Копировать ссылку на пост
 
Christian James
 
Christian James
 
Cunnilingus
 
Christian James
 
Cunnilingus
 
Christian James
 
Cunnilingus
 
Cunnilingus
 
Christian James
 
Christian James
 
Al 240d
Al
1
3
Копировать ссылку на пост
 
Cunnilingus
 
Christian James
 
Christian James
 
Cunnilingus 241d
Cunnilingus
Ответить
Копировать ссылку на пост
Cunnilingus 241d
Cunnilingus
1
Копировать ссылку на пост
 
Christian James
Aleph 𐤀 205d
Aleph 𐤀
Ответить
Копировать ссылку на пост
Добавить комментарий
Hey, don't be shy, you can at me, right? Go ahead now. What I said was that it wasn't some universal rule that was practically applicable to every moral situation, which is what an objective moral truth is. The Bible is interested in making valuable people, people who have virtuous characters. So it's okay to have sometimes morally permissible and sometimes morally impermissible standards because it's moral reason.
1
10
Копировать ссылку на пост
Just to add on to the last part there, it's moral reasoning that separates the Christian from the non-Christian in terms of determining what is morally correct. So I never said the Golden Rule wasn't applicable in some circumstances and applicable in others, but it certainly isn't some universal truth, which is what I was asking you about when you said that you thought that the Golden Rule was a good place to start for all moral conversations. That's nonsense. The good place to start for all moral conversations is God's existence.
Ответить
Копировать ссылку на пост
Placing God as the summum bonum, or the greatest or highest good, is the best place to start for moral conversations because it allows you to have a variety of different perspectives in regards to how exactly we achieve Christ-likeness or God-likeness, and doesn't limit you to some kind of merely human understanding of ethics that is interested in some kind of merely representative view of some kind of golden rule.
Ответить
Копировать ссылку на пост
I don't think it's nonsense CJ I really don't and you know if I said if I told you well you're basing what's good and what's right what's good and bad off of the Bible that that's nonsense that religion is nonsense you know if I said that to you that would be rude and you would not like that very much there's plenty of people who think that you know well I mean look I think I'm a pretty good person
Ответить
Копировать ссылку на пост
I didn't say that your moral view was nonsense. I said that your characterization of my view, saying that I thought the golden rule wasn't applicable in any circumstance because I critiqued your usage of it in every circumstance, is nonsense. It's not the view that I articulated to you. If I misrepresented you, you're more than welcome to call that nonsense. I never said your whole view was nonsense. Your critique doesn't apply.
1
Ответить
Копировать ссылку на пост
Okay. Alright, I see what you're saying. I get it. But if basing it on the Golden Rule, and the Golden Rule has foundation in Christianity, and you think deciding what's good and wrong is based on Christianity, then isn't that, don't we have the same view?
Ответить
Копировать ссылку на пост
The golden rule may originate from Christianity, which it doesn't, by the way. The golden rule, or the sentiment of the golden rule, exists way earlier than Christianity. If that's true, right, even if it was true that it originated in Christianity, the foundation for moral truths or ethical values or to be a valuable person, the sumum bonum, would not become the rule itself. It would remain God. God would be the source and foundation and summit for these moral rules, even if the rules were universal.
Ответить
Копировать ссылку на пост
I see your reasoning, and I understand. What makes your perspective on deciding what's right and wrong better than mine? I mean, who's to say you're right and I'm wrong, or I'm right and you're wrong, or that either of us are right or wrong? You know? Seriously.
Ответить
Копировать ссылку на пост
I actually don't mind criticism I think it's good to be to think about why you think certain ways it's I think it's healthy but you know yes last night you're you're you're asking me and you're asking me and nobody else is given a perspective and they're the group is laughing at me as you drill me and listen to my answers and shit it's fucked up man
Ответить
Копировать ссылку на пост
Well, the way that you frame this question is problematic. I don't think that it's a matter of my perspective versus your perspective. I don't see what is morally true as a matter of perspective. So the right answer to this question is, whoever among us has the closest articulation of what is morally right or what is morally wrong to what is true of God is the person who has the most morally upright position. It's not a matter of whose perspective is better.
Ответить
Копировать ссылку на пост
I will in the future discourage people from laughing at you while I'm doing a reductio while I'm engaging with questions I'm sorry. I didn't know that hurt your feelings. I didn't I genuinely didn't mean to do that
Ответить
Копировать ссылку на пост
I mean I don't know if you should start with the existence of God because you know not everybody has an experience with God but you have an experience with how you treat other people and how you want to be treated and for that fact I disagree that you should start with the existence of God. You just start with the moral standpoint of like how to treat people morally, what is
1
3
Копировать ссылку на пост
I agree with you, bro. You don't necessarily have to accept this God or this religion in entirety to be able to say, I can live by these rules. I think I can, this is a guideline, a decent guideline. CJ disagrees. He disagrees for the reasoning of why I chose. I think it's a good idea. I don't know.
Ответить
Копировать ссылку на пост
We can't answer the question of how to treat people morally by starting with treating people morally. It's just a circle. The reason why you start with God's existence is because God is the, if you will, the greatest good, the sumum bonum, the highest good. I'm not just starting there because I think everyone has an experience of God. I'm starting there because I believe God exists and God is true for everyone regardless of whether or not they personally believe that God exists. God does exist.
Ответить
Копировать ссылку на пост
I also never disagreed that you don't have to believe in God's existence to still hold that the Golden Rule is practically applicable in all sorts of moral situations. What God's existence is required for is the ontology of moral statements, how they exist, the stuff they're made of or the stuff that they're subsistent of, not the actual moral statements themselves that we all can believe in or not believe in.
Ответить
Копировать ссылку на пост
CJ, you argued with me for how long against this, and I'm sure that you knew that in the Bible Jesus literally said it. I mean, you're so much, you know so much about Christianity, and you're, I can't imagine that you did not know this. I didn't know this, but I can't believe you didn't know this. I believe that you did.
Ответить
Копировать ссылку на пост
I don't know how to at you. I hit the add button and a bunch of people come up It's like gives me people to select from but you're not on the list, and I don't have a way to Search so I don't know I don't know how to at you, but but I would I'll figure it out
1
Копировать ссылку на пост
The beginning of my message that don't be shy, you can at me was a reference to a TikTok that I watch where it's like, don't be shy, you can at me sis, cause ain't nothing worse than a pick me bitch. That's what I was referencing, I wasn't actually saying that you should or should not at me, it was just a reference to a quote that I like to quote sometimes. But no, it's okay that you didn't at me, I saw it anyway.
1
Ответить
Копировать ссылку на пост
I think when we use terms such as hardcore Christian, we need to come to an objective definition of what hardcore, quote unquote, Christian is, you know what I'm saying? You're either a Christian or you're not. There's no Christian and hardcore and softcore Christian. But anyway, yeah, regarding the post, yeah, it is definitely a reasonable way to go about things because God has given us a conscience and given us emotions and we know what makes a Christian.
Ответить
Копировать ссылку на пост
Добавить комментарий

Похожие Посты

Cunnilingus
Cunnilingus

😄

6
6
Cunnilingus
Cunnilingus

Math from 1965 suggests the presents of the sub-atomic Higgs particle.. proven decades later once the technology became available to test it. Don't underestimate the power of sounds mathematics 😎

4
4
Cunnilingus
Cunnilingus

Elon Musk hosts town hall with independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

4
4
Cunnilingus
Cunnilingus

#1 answer is....🤣 @stupid_angry, tell your boy Cigar I'm sorry he got so butthurt. He got his feeling hurt and blocked me.

8
8
Cunnilingus
Cunnilingus

Hey @stupid_angry ... Chem E. my boy😎����🏽

12
12
Cunnilingus
Cunnilingus

NAFTA and CAFTA's Net effect on the U.S. economy was negative. So why are we doing the TTP?

35
35
Cunnilingus
Cunnilingus

I like how kids in their 20s like to preach to everyone as if they got it all figured out. The expression goes, "Where you are, is where I once was." No offense.. you don't know shit yet kid.

46
46
4
Cunnilingus
Cunnilingus

Philosophies are like a**holes... everybody's got one.

44
44
2
Cunnilingus
Cunnilingus

You wouldn't believe traffic today...

40
40
Cunnilingus
Cunnilingus

The government does not want the people to be united and come together against corporations buying U.S. elections. They want us to fight each other, it's an effective way to control the population.

41
41
Cunnilingus
Cunnilingus

Should an independent, nonpartisan agency audit the Federal Reserve?

48
48
1
Cunnilingus
Cunnilingus

Candidates that spend more money, typically win. 😯

56
56
4
Cunnilingus
Cunnilingus

Should I suddenly acknowledge that definitively God exists, because someone asked me if I could categorize colors by wavelength, which I most certainly can. This apparently is an "absurd" argument?😂

86
86
8
Cunnilingus
Cunnilingus

Women initiate divorce more often now than in the past because women now have more job opportunities and higher independent incomes, making getting a divorce less financially risky than it once was.

44
44
1
Cunnilingus
Cunnilingus

It's really ok to have a conversation with someone who thinks differently than you. You don't have to try to change someone's mind. You can learn their perspective and expand your mind though.

95
95
6
Follow Us
Русский
© Stereo, 2024
Получите все возможности приложения Stereo
Открыть приложение