Нажимая "Хорошо", вы соглашаетесь на сохранение файлов cookie на вашем устройстве для улучшения навигации по сайту, анализа использования сайта и помощи в наших маркетинговых усилиях.
One thing that me and my partner has been talking about like further down, we don't live together now, but further down the line we would do is like how to split the finances. And I'd be curious to know like do you guys split it like 50-50 or, because like the thing that we talked about was that we split like all the things that we have in common like the bills and like electricity, water, rent, all that sort of stuff. split like 50-50 but then like the other money would just allocate so that we have like we can spend it on our own kind of. I think that's like a pretty good way to do it because in that way you don't have to like if your partner wants to buy something excessive they can do it as long as it's out of their own pocket and then you can just sort of be a bit more independent about like the way you spend your money. So what are your thoughts on this? Would you prefer to have it that way or prefer to split it 50-50?
Yeah I think we describe is a good way of looking at it I've always seen it in the sense of if your joint on most things as in like your bills because you live together or do you know if you're going out together and we're not then in a 50-50 is the fairest way to do it with each person have in their own set aside funds for themselves I also think it depends on how much each of them running because if someone is running light 150 K a year and zones are in 30 K yeah maybe splitting the bills Expensive they are not always be the pharaoh
Maybe there's a more reasonable split in that sense but if it's like okay as a couple before you're married if it's like we live in together when we got to that to pay that both benefit us it's okay the bills and groceries et cetera then split those anything else we own is like your own money that we can choose to spend on each other if you want or spend on ourselves or me a blow out the casino whatever it is and yeah that way everyone has their own individual finances in together you could've been
You're raising a very fair point here of like if it's fair enough to split it 50-50 if one person is earning like a lot more and I think that's like comes down to every relationship each to their own kind of thing but yeah I definitely think that is a discussion that needs to be had in those cases because I don't think it's always fair that that the person earning less should be paying equally if it's like a major gap.
Yeah, I think it's a very good way to have those sort of like split finances In a way, but like also shared ones so that you can Still somewhat control your own finances and like do what you want with them Without your partner needing to pay for like your weird habits or casino visits or whatever it could be So yeah, I think that makes a lot of sense.
What kind of situation you're in depends I give you pharmacy both actively working and yes if someone is not actively working then you have to have your nonnegotiable's and speak on what is a trade-off or a equivalent exchange And at this moment I'm venturing into that
Yeah, I know, like you're raising a very fair point here of like if both are actively working or not because obviously if One of the people in the relationship isn't working then I think that's fair to have a conversation about How to split it and maybe the person working could take on more responsibility for sure So it's definitely about the situation and it can vary a lot from person to person and relationship to relationship for sure.