What I find is so funny, AI art is not art. Let's agree on that, okay? AI art is not art. But what do you consider to be art then? Because that now means that art is no longer subjective. It's not based on interpretation, so you can't use that. And let's put the taking of people's work for environment and billionaires and corporations to the side. Let's take that out of your argument and let's only focus on what is deemed to be art. Because let us not forget that there is a banana duct taped to a wall that has been sold for $6.2 million and there is a toilet that's been painted gold that has been sold for $12.1 million. Don't believe me? Search it up. If you're telling me that AI art is not art, what are you considering art? Because those two, to me, is called art slot. block don't forget museums are also corporations do not forget there are museums are run by people they are also billionaires they sell this art your art should have gone there these people are taking your money as well what do you consider to be art it's so funny to me

well I don't know about you right but whenever I think about art I just think drawing, painting to make a pure mad sculpture thing Doesn't matter whether it's like on a building or on a piece of paper as long as it's drawing and painting I just think aye that's art basically