Нажимая "Хорошо", вы соглашаетесь на сохранение файлов cookie на вашем устройстве для улучшения навигации по сайту, анализа использования сайта и помощи в наших маркетинговых усилиях.
This is a clear example of a lost individual, a simp or simpish behavior to say the least. A man who have not self or deep self reflected upon his own self worth and only places value in materialistic things to such an extent that he can't even acknowledge his partner's natural role as a member of the family and this is just outrageously crazy and so many women is jumping on this bandwagon in support of this.
But how can you say that he's a simp when this is his wife? He's not simping for a woman That he can't have or hasn't got do you know I'm saying So I just think you're just conflicted of what he's doing for her, and I don't think there's anything wrong with giving your wife an allowance You know I mean he didn't have to put it out there like that, but I don't see the issue
No, let me tell you the parts that I agree with. I don't mind him taking care of his wife. I do feel that, I'm a traditionist. I do feel like it is upon the man to make sure that he takes care of his wife completely and her money is her money and his money is for the family. But to say everything, I just give it to her, no. It is her natural right to maintain a household, to take care of the family, do these things. She shouldn't be paid for that. You can give her allowance, you can do other things for her.
Yeah, I agree in the sense of when he said paid, it was a little bit off key, I'm not going to lie. He didn't really have to say anything. He could have shortened that post with literally like one sentence and just said, you know what? Provide for your wife and your money should be her money and her money should be her money. Do you know what I'm saying? Give her allowance if you, if you can afford it. This guy is just flexing, you know. I said, yeah, I give her a quarter of a million and she does whatever she wants. Yeah. But other than that, it's okay.