🍪 En cliquant "Ok", vous acceptez le stockage de cookies sur votre appareil afin d'améliorer la navigation sur le site, d'analyser l'utilisation du site et de nous aider dans nos efforts de marketing.
Would be so nice to experience 16th century death penalty, with top marketing tools. Chop someone's head on a Stadium, or a big public place, like Time Square, and sell hotdogs, beer , and fan club accessories for a top Dollar! Food and punishmeent entertainment.
I'm not a fan of hard labor because I see that being a slippery slope for corporate exploitation, right, like privatized prisons, then them wanting to get the prison rate up because they're making money off of prisoners now, so you could see how they would incorporate low-level drug crimes as jailable offenses because they can make money off of the prison labor pool, so I don't trust corporations.
Yeah, that makes sense. I just don't see any real long-term solutions to dealing with criminals, I guess. People who don't play by the rules of society.
low-key I like the death penalty but I don't like it can be good like for the really bad people that can get released later in life but at the same time there's been people who are just convicted but they're not you know like actually guilty and then they die and then it's a wrongdoing that's legit like why they stopped doing deaths is because of the all the people who didn't do
right that's the that's the dilemma one of the dilemmas right first of all like if killings wrong why is it right for the state to do it but then like you said wrongfully convicted people getting put to death that's fucked up
I actually think it's letting a violent criminal off easy, um, by killing them, you know, I think making them rot in jail for the rest of their life would be better punishment, but to each their own. We each have our own opinions.
I see your point, alright, like so murder and rape and crimes like that, but does it really depend on the crime? Because if you want to go at it from like a moral, philosophical point of view, like if killing's wrong, how could it be right for the state to do it? You know, so that's kind of the angle I was coming with, but to each their own.
Not only am I not in favor, but the French embassy in D.C. held a discussion about it, and I got to meet people from all over the world who actually advocate against it, including somebody who was falsely accused of committing a crime and was on death row, and then it was overturned when he was exonerated. So, there are a lot of problems to the death penalty.
Don't you think having to spend your whole life in prison would be worse punishment than being executed and taken out of your misery? And then from a moral standpoint, my position is that if killing's wrong, it's wrong. So how could it be okay for the state to do it, right?