One account of knowledge is that knowledge is justified through belief. That is, we have a belief of something and we have justification of it. And as long as that belief is true, then that counts as knowledge. One question here is, what are the necessary and sufficient conditions for knowledge? Is that right? Do we have to have justification for knowledge? Or are there some things that justify themselves and aren't justified in terms of other things? So I'm asking you, what is knowledge?

What is knowledge? Well, if you break down the word it means To know something I don't know what edge means I'd have to go to a dictionary and look up edge but to know something that's what I'm gonna say and To know something doesn't mean it has to be true but just you know something doesn't have to be true or false just I know

I know that it's green if she says it's green. I know what she's going to say before she says it and Knowing something doesn't isn't really advantageous in all respects You can't really apply what you know sometimes sometimes knowledge has to be hidden or withheld like you're not supposed to tell somebody you know something.

So I think knowledge is the compounding of knowing things. So you know this, you know that, and you're constantly comparing what you know or what you believe you know. And like I said, you could know what somebody else knows, but you also know that it doesn't have to necessarily be true what they know. And...

So I could have knowledge of people and what they know. And my knowledge is of what other people know or their beliefs. And I could tell myself that I know better through the compounding of knowledge, I know better. Because I'm constantly comparing what people believe they know with what I know and coming too.