Cookies
Al hacer clic en "Está bien", aceptas el almacenamiento de cookies en tu dispositivo para mejorar la navegación del sitio, analizar el uso del sitio y ayudar en nuestros esfuerzos de marketing.
Está bien
Aprender más
Audio
Texto
Agregar comentario
It's funny too because the attacks that you use, I mean, you're making a mockery of this but your own bible says that if your wife comes between you and a man fighting and she grabs him by the nuts, cut off her arm and have no pity for it, and, and you point at our religion,
1
1
Copiar enlace del post
So, here's the thing about when you say attacks right, no one's attacking Islam, I'm exposing Islam So if they expose themselves like an attack. There's a certain thing in there that you probably wish that wouldn't come to light. The other day you were confused about why people are against Islam because they don't assimilate. Then I showed you from the whores' mouth that they plan to take over America they're not interested in assimilating. and that's why I'm exposing themselves, not climbing an attack.
1
Responder
Copiar enlace del post
hey you can check me on this, but the consensus of the scholars say that um this is not Zena umm, eh, but if a man lusts after a woman that's on him unless Her intentions were to get his attention, so it's about be intention and we're all responsible for our own gaze
Responder
Copiar enlace del post
hey you can check me on this, but the consensus of the scholars say that um this is not Zena umm, eh, but if a man lusts after a woman that's on him unless Her intentions were to get his attention, so it's about be intention and we're all responsible for our own gaze
2
Copiar enlace del post
these are the consensus of the scholars saying that this is nonzena so basically, the shaykh in his video that I posted he's just making stuff up, right? because from what I can see is that he's saying on the same basis that a woman can't wear perfume in public is the same reason why they can only go out with their hair uncovered and even have their voices be heard in public because I might not hear their voice and become tempted that's the same- that's the same foundation of it
1
Responder
Copiar enlace del post
And we should actually hone in on the core argument which was, umm That if you're practising a religion for years, decades And you still have no self-control That that's evidence of dead faith Because a dead tree can't produce fruit at all You know what I'm saying? If you have no self-control, no patience, no love, no joy What you're believing in is false So that's the root that I really want to hone in on Because you can't go around blaming women for your lack of self-control And limiting them from even wearing perfume That's crazy
1
Responder
Copiar enlace del post
and by the way, Alif, you mentioned about seeing a woman's face in her hair why is it that every depiction that we see of Mary may Allah be pleased with her that she always has a head covering you know, umm, even Christians in Europe and America used to wear, the women used to cover their hair with scarves and things like that it's just, uhh, your attacks are weird, bro and they're like desperate spirit
1
Copiar enlace del post
you know you're misrepresenting my argument because it has nothing to do with head coverings in general, yeah i'm not demonising head coverings and saying oh women shouldn't wear head coverings i'm not saying that i'm talking about the muslim doctrine of why women should have their faces covered their their hair covered their ankles covered not wearing perfume shouldn't be heard in public stems from men not being able to control themselves because they always blame the woman for their lack of self-control and their luck
1
Responder
Copiar enlace del post
Agregar comentario
Obtén la experiencia completa en la aplicación Stereo
Abrir app