Cookies

Al hacer clic en "Está bien", aceptas el almacenamiento de cookies en tu dispositivo para mejorar la navegación del sitio, analizar el uso del sitio y ayudar en nuestros esfuerzos de marketing.
Está bien
Aprender más
Audio
Texto
TruthLogic 282d
TruthLogic
1
Responder
Copiar enlace del post
Gradyray 281d
Gradyray
1
Responder
Copiar enlace del post
DineX 282d
DineX
3
Copiar enlace del post
 
LetsThink
 
TruthLogic
 
LetsThink
 
Dillon Blount 278d
Dillon Blount
Responder
Copiar enlace del post
Dillon Blount 278d
Dillon Blount
Responder
Copiar enlace del post
Dillon Blount 278d
Dillon Blount
Responder
Copiar enlace del post
Agregar comentario
I know... I know that umm, some people are gonna give you pushback for this But this is not information that should be argued over These are facts that should be pondered over
1
Responder
Copiar enlace del post
The original verses, the original Bible verses... When they started translating them was misinterpreted, ...incredibly wrong. There are many umm, versions of the Bible and none of them are the same.
1
Responder
Copiar enlace del post
umm, there's no evidence for you to say Jesus Christ was never crucified so, there's no historical evidence. You just making a claim umm, you say that Jesus Christ is the messiah and there are many prophecies one being, like him being born as a virgin and many others, all fulfilled in Jesus
3
Copiar enlace del post
Transcribiendo...
1
Responder
Copiar enlace del post
Dynex, for you to say there's no evidence when clearly Jerome was mentioned there, that's no different than Christians talking about something Josephus said as evidence, you know? Are you just saying stuff to be saying it or are you actually listening and thinking about what's being said? Or is it just defend what you believe at all cost, even if it don't make sense?
2
Responder
Copiar enlace del post
Transcribiendo...
1
Responder
Copiar enlace del post
Demonstrably false. Saint Jerome in his work against the Luciferians, his letter, which he is quoting by the way, this, um, shake or whatever. Uh, he's addressing the heresy of Docetism, the belief that Jesus Christ was fully God, but was not human. And he was an act spiritual avatar that was made manifest here on earth has nothing to do with the crucifixion. This guy's is lying through his teeth.
Responder
Copiar enlace del post
If you think I am wrong, just do some study on his anthropology, St. Jerome's writing against the Luciferians, and you will see that he is clearly talking about docetism. It is not in the reference to the event of the crucifixion, but whether or not Jesus had a physical body at all.
Responder
Copiar enlace del post
This major disagreement in Christianity is not the Trinity, he's right about that, but he's also wrong about whatever nonsense he's talking about. The first major disagreement was the Council of Jerusalem, which was a local Synod between St. Peter and St. Paul, and St. Andrew was presiding over the Synod. The disagreement was on about whether or not a Gentile should undergo circumcision and partake of the Jewish customs, which the Synod ultimately decided on, no, that's
Responder
Copiar enlace del post
Agregar comentario
Follow Us
© Stereo, 2026
¡No te lo pierdas!
Las personas en Stereo son las primeras que hablan sobre ello
¡Vamos!