Anónimo
Revelar
2
9
Compartir
Copiar enlace del post
Cookies
Al hacer clic en "Está bien", aceptas el almacenamiento de cookies en tu dispositivo para mejorar la navegación del sitio, analizar el uso del sitio y ayudar en nuestros esfuerzos de marketing.
Está bien
Aprender más
Audio
Texto
Agregar comentario
Well, the concept is, if a man cannot provide for himself, then how can he provide for a woman? The problem is, most men want to provide for a woman, when they themselves aren't able to provide themselves. You have to be able to treat yourself good so you can treat others. It doesn't work like that.
1
Responder
Copiar enlace del post
So many different definitions of a man nowadays, I really can't say if he's a man or not because people looking for different definitions in a man, but I would say yes.
Responder
Copiar enlace del post
Define provide like bring money if it's like not marriage then I don't care but like the reason why I think like marriage is like important for a man to provide is for like well we all need to provide so if you're not bringing shit in it's over we're not I'm not marrying you
Responder
Copiar enlace del post
If a man can't provide, he can't provide for his self, meaning he don't got nothing. I feel like a man can, you know what I'm saying, a man can still be a man without providing, but at the same time it's like it's embedded into your blood to provide no matter what. But work on yourselves first and then provide for the woman, you see what I'm saying?
1
Copiar enlace del post
How is it embedded in your blood if you have to tell him to go make money? By the way, I'm not defending people who have no aspirations or don't want to work, but with that being said, like, people keep saying it's in our DNA. If it's in our DNA to be this way, we shouldn't have to mock and ridicule and shame people into doing what their traditional role is supposed to be. It's a social construct.
Responder
Copiar enlace del post
mean you you have to like provide for your like woman to be fair but if times are rough and it doesn't work then i mean what are you gonna do about it so yeah
Responder
Copiar enlace del post
What do you mean provide? Do you mean earthly possessions or spiritual possessions? Those are two different things to provide. Yeah, facts one.
Responder
Copiar enlace del post
No, he is not a man yet, but not in the way that you're trying to frame it. You're trying to frame it like a derogatory term for him, but no, he has not become a man yet. So, this whole idea of, oh, we're going to go 50-50, yeah, that is not a man's way of thinking. That is a boy or even a female's way of thinking. So, you're half correct.
Responder
Copiar enlace del post
I would say you shouldn't base yourself off women, because women come and go. So basing your self-esteem and your self-worth solely on what others think of you is going to lead to disaster. Same thing for possessions. You need to build your self-esteem and self-identity. So whether women are there or not, or the money is there or not, you're going to be good bro.
Responder
Copiar enlace del post
Agregar comentario
Obtén la experiencia completa en la aplicación Stereo
Abrir app